Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 9,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
A general framework to analyze options for raising revenues should pay attention to the capacity of a tax to raise revenue in a weak economic situation, and the burden the tax would place on economic recovery (both on demand and supply through higher taxes on consumption, or alternatively business investment and hiring). [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:07 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
What needs to happen domestically for an active ingredient to be “produced in the United States”? [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 3:11 pm
Hignell v City of New Orleans, 2020 WL 4541478 (ED LA 8/6/2020) [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Some of the relevant publications were Safety Review, starting in 1944, United States Navy Medicine, The Naval Medical Bulletin, and United States Navy Medical News Letter. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:10 am
Indeed, Pryor cites FN19 of United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
One of the agencies, Catholic Social Services, sued, arguing that it has a free exercise right to do business with the city while continuing to discriminate against same-sex couples, whose marriage rights are protected by the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
In determining whether the term GUARANTEED RATE has acquired distinctiveness, the TTAB considered the 6 factors set forth in In re Snowizard, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (TTAB 2018) (quoting Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
