Search for: "United States v. David" Results 2001 - 2020 of 6,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, which was recently argued before the Supreme Court; Orin Kerr would say they are at the center of the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis met with their Australian counterparts in Sydney today to demonstrate the United States’ commitment to the Asia-Pacific region at the annual Australia-United States Ministerial Consultations. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on a pending cert petition, Kisela v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
The Court of Appeal grantd the newspaper's writ petition, finding the order an impermissible prior restraint violative of both the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
Five men in total were charged in connection with the armed robbery spree, but only David went to trial: his accomplices all testified against him. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
  In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage notes that, in his concurring opinion in Connick, Justice Scalia cited the Court’s 1988 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am by Jeff Welty
Among the authorities ruling or suggesting that sexual acts are privileged communications are United States v. [read post]