Search for: "Abbott v. Abbott" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 10:57 am by Amy Howe
” The answer to that question was revealed on December 19, when the FTC – with general counsel Alden Abbott as counsel of record – filed its own petition for certiorari in FTC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Famous Trials 1 v. (193?) [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Non-Assignment Clauses are Enforceable   In Western Alliance Bank v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
Which brings us to a new piece of legislation passed by the Texas Legislature and signed into law by Governor Abbott, to be effective on March 5, 2024. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
The Victorian Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal to CFMEU official John Setka after Tony Abbott’s Hore-Lacy defence was upheld. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Cambridge analytica, data misuse, and platform responsibility, Room 280B, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA, Thursday 24 May 2018, 12:50pm – 2:00pm. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]