Search for: "Blog Editorial" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 3:29 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
The latest example is a provision in the annual defense authorization bill that would allow the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:14 am by Wells Bennett
  That’s the argument advanced by Dominic Basulto, anyway, over at the Washington Post’s “Innovations” blog. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
And in light of last week’s decision by the First Circuit invalidating Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (which Lyle covered for this blog), the editorial board of the New York Times argues that although “[t]he nation would be well-served if the justices let the panel’s ruling stand,” it would be even “[b]etter yet” if Congress would “just repeal the dreadful law. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
" Blouse (via flea market, via Bombay, India); Loft skirt (clearance last year); Ann Taylor cami (at least 15 years old but this woman can launder some delicates); Breva ice blue pumps (John Fluevog); Cuff (Jada's Jewels) I assumed when my three-year term on the Paralegal Division Council was up, I'd gracefully hand over my Editorial Calendar to another bossy, rather OCD paralegal, and fade into the sunset, to pursue my other hobbies, you know, that monthly paralegal… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
  The Washington Post reports on the role played by federal employees in the DOMA litigation, while the editorial board of the Boston Herald calls on the Court to restore the “balanced relationship” between states and the federal government “destroyed” by DOMA. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  Land Use Rules Have Prevented Four Million People From Moving to the Bay Area -  from the PropertyProf Blog. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
The editorial board of the New York Times criticizes last week’s decision in Blueford v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Editorial Note: Dr Erasmus Strangelove pronounces his surname ‘Strangle – ov”  That is all. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
  According to one Superior Court of Massachusetts, it does not, advises Michael Rosen in Foley & Hoag's Massachusetts Non-Compete Blog. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am by Cormac Early
 ;At this blog, Brian Wolfman analyzed the decision in in Taniguchi v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:57 am by admin
  It’s the same advice we have been giving for a decade. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
  At this blog, Kristine Knaplund analyzes Monday’s decision in Astrue v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am by Randy Barnett
And, this morning, the Wall Street Journal has a strong editorial on the subject: The first fallacy is defining judicial activism as overturning a Congressional law. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:54 am by Adam Thierer
As Eugene Volokh noted in a recent white paper, social media providers should possess the editorial discretion to determine how their platforms are configured and what can appear on them. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
(It’s a product, after all, so we can talk about this issue on a products liability blog, right?) [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:50 am by Robin E. Shea
"   Speaking of moms, I was honored to be a part of the May Employment Law Blog Carnival: Mother's Day Edition, hosted by plaintiff's employment attorney Donna Ballmer. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:15 am by Josh Sturtevant
If Google has been eliminating blogs due to editorial content (particularly when that content is discussing a potential, currently legal, outcome of an ongoing trial), it is something that ;I believe deserves attention, and I would be happy to use this page as a forum to bring these practices to light if I believed doing so would help. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
A Huffington Post blog ;entry said that the stay granted by the US Supreme Court on February 17, 2012 sets up a possible full-blown rematch over the 2010 Citizens United decision that allowed unlimited corporate campaign spending. [read post]