Search for: "In re D. W." Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
“We’re using data on housing and neighborhood conditions to help cities identify the areas that need the most help. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 3:13 am
In re Allegiance Staffing, Serial No. 85663950 (July 9, 2015) [precedential]. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
The D&O Diary is on assignment in Europe this week, with the first stop in the southern German city of Munich, to attend Munich Re’s Global Casualty Claims Conference. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Liza Hanks
You’d much rather put that money into a trust that’s managed for your children until they grow up to an age where they’re likely to use the money more wisely. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
” … [But w]hen an officer does not reasonably perceive a danger, we will not presume that such danger nevertheless exists or that the officer’s inquiry about weapons would address such danger. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  After a two-week bench trial, the court agreed with C&D that SPD’s advertising was false, and found SPD’s deception to be intentional and egregious, although C&D failed to prove a breach of the parties’ prior settlement agreement. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 If it couldn't be tolerated, there'd be nothing left. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Discovery Beyond the Report and the Deposition The lesson of the cases interpreting Rule 26 is that counsel cannot count exclusively upon the report and automatic disclosure requirements to obtain the materials necessary or helpful for cross-examination of statisticians who have created their own analyses. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
W/o harmonization, standards for advertising were different—protection very strict in Germany, 10-15% misled = sufficient for misleading. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Dinwoodie: w/o empirical tools, you either end up w/judge as your empirical proxy or judge as normative decider. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]