Search for: "In re P. F." Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bic Pen Corp., 725 F.2d 1240, 1248 (9th Cir. 1984).)Note: Whoa, Nelly! [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  No Arizona plaintiffs appealed in Darvocet, so the Sixth Circuit’s opinion, In re Darvocet, Darvon, & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation,___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 2959271 (6th Cir. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
The recent issue of Environmental Health Perspectives contains several interesting articles on scientific methodology of interest to lawyers who litigate claimed health effects.[1] The issue also contains a commentary that argues for greater transparency in science and science policy, which should be a good thing, but yet the commentary has the potential to obscure and confuse. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:40 am
" [So is the "F" word (no, not "fraud") in common usage, and who would say that the "F" word isn't vulgar? [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
PÉNAL (DROIT) — procédure pénale — procédure fédérale — requête en modification des conditions de détention — secteur restrictif — transfèrement — droit à une défense pleine et entière — équité du procès. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
 (Pix from Business and Human Rights Resource Center,  Binding treaty: Pros and cons (June 2014))As the Business and Human Rights Resource Center explained:At the 26th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, two resolutions were tabled for adoption by the Council. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Amy Howe
At Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
La procréation a été réalisée en implantant dans un ovule fécondé in vitro par le père dans le corps de la mère porteuse. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
P v Q v R ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q­­­_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110Juridiction : Cour d’appel fédérale (C.A.F.), A-89-13Décision de : Juges Denis Pelletier, Robert M. [read post]