Search for: "JORDAN v. JORDAN" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Globe and Mail reports that psychologist Jordan Peterson is suing Wilfrid Laurier University following comments made about him during a disciplinary of one their staff members- the subject of the disciplinary had showed a video of one of Peterson’s lectures to a class. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Also in the justices’ guest box is Jordan Lorence of Alliance Defending Freedom. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Whomever Trump selects, “aides inside the West Wing feel excited about the Supreme Court pick, viewing it as a chance for Trump to score a victory,” reports Jordan Fabian of The Hill. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Last month, my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students Jenna Mersereau, Jennifer Milazzo, and Jordan Wolf and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Prof. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 20, April 27, May 10, May 17 and May 24 conferences)   Jordan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by Charlie Dunlap
But I would have also thought the same of criminalizing the teaching of law as “material support,” but the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]