Search for: "John Doe Inc. I-V" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[15]  The Commission also said that “the fact that a registrant is exposed to a material transition risk does not necessarily result in its … emissions being de facto material to the registrant. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
City of L.A., decided by Justice John Segal, joined by Justice Dennis Perluss (read the opinion itself for much more, and there's also a discussion of a constitutional right to privacy claim that I blogged about separately): Neil deGrasse Tyson once said in an interview, "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
First, despite some recognition by the Justices that the efficient market theory underlying Basic Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Mills also held that ANRE’s untimeliness was not excusable for good cause which, citing a federal court decision in Pay TV of Greater New York, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Mills also held that ANRE’s untimeliness was not excusable for good cause which, citing a federal court decision in Pay TV of Greater New York, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
S. 872 (1990), the Court drastically cut back on the protection provided by the Free Exercise Clause, and in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Grammy winner John Legend was one of many in the creative industries concerned that the  verdict could set a worying precedent for artists creating music inspired by others. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]