Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am by Gilles Cuniberti
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT Lord Wilson gives the lead judgment of the Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
Similarly, applicants who have been coached will say “the Lord’s Prayer” is their favorite, and then recite some variation of the traditional Catholic grace before a meal (i.e. not the Lord’s Prayer). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
The Delaware Supreme Court, in a decision issued last week in Blaustein v Lord Baltimore Capital Corp., No. 272 [Del. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:29 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On 14 January, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Jones v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael Lowe
In Texas, both federal and state laws exist to protect people like Hephzibal Olivia Lord from being overwhelmed and mistreated by police during criminal investigations. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
  However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm by Machiko Kanetake
Lord Hoffmann found “no value” in the Committee’s position (para. 57). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“Transaction costs, privacy, and trust: The laudable goals and ultimate failure of notice and choice to respect privacy online”, Kirsten Martin, First Monday, Next week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2014, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Reed, Hughes and Hodge) will hear the case of Secretary of State for Home Department v A. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
 Back in the High Court, on 7 October 2013 Lord Justice Floyd (as he now was) issued an order that restrained TV Catchup from retransmission via its streaming services without obtaining a licence from the broadcasters (ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
Indeed, Lord Sumption stated in his judgment that patent law should depend on “more substantial and predictable considerations than these”. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This reluctance has been captured by an admonition credited to Lord Denning about the importance of a judge not conducting the examination of witnesses because “he, so to speak, descends into the arena and is liable to have his vision clouded by the dust of conflict …” (Lord Denning was quoting Lord Greene MR, in Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15, 20.) [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
  At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]