Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 9:35 am
Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut; Susan J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:35 am
Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut; Susan J. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
” Ronald J. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
The contract contained the following provisions on governing law and dispute resolution: (a) the contract is to governed by New York law, with an exclusion of renvoi (Section 12.10(a)); (b) each party accepted the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in New York (Section 12.10(b)) and (c) all disputes shall be settled by arbitration in New York in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association, without prejudice to the right of any party to make an… [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
Adrian J. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:57 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:57 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
On 11 May 2012, Sharp J handed down judgment in the case of King v Grundon. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
Ms Phillips sought an order that Mr Mulcaire swear an affidavit giving information about the individuals who had instructed him, the interception he was instructed to carry out and other matters. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
Ms Phillips sought an order that Mr Mulcaire swear an affidavit giving information about the individuals who had instructed him, the interception he was instructed to carry out and other matters. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Treaty. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Attorney Christopher J. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm
Instead, in deciding whether or not there has been an authorisation all 5 judges directed attention to the 3 criteria specified in 101(1A) and 36(1A): (a) the extent (if any) of the person’s power to prevent the doing of the act concerned; (b) the nature of any relationship existing between the person and the person who did the act concerned; (c) whether the person took any other reasonable steps to prevent or avoid the doing of the act, including whether the person complied… [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:16 pm
As James B. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:16 pm
As James B. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
Albert J. [read post]
