Search for: "Matter of David B."
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
David L. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:05 pm
§982(a)(2)(B) (Criminal Forfeiture) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
David M. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Keith Davidson—Davidson, Clifford’s lawyer, is “Lawyer B” in the statement of facts. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Nicholas Bruno, Marcos Rosales, David J. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
– David Deal ~~~ Thank you for being a voice of truth… maybe people will wake UP!!! [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Through the 1985 amendment to CPLR 3101, of which subdivision (d)(1)(i) is a part, the Legislature intended to "expand disclosure" (David D. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 9:52 am
From today's unanimous Washington Supreme Court opinion (written by Justice Sheryl Gordon McCloud) in In the Matter of Keenan, reversing a decision I discussed last month: The Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) ruled that Judge David S. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
B. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Sheldon Whitehouse, and a panel discussion with David Kris, Ethan Arenson, David Bitkower, and Jane Horvath. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Judge Pohl promised to look into the matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
David E. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681s-2(a), and FCRA's private rights of action are available to enforce violations of Section 1681s-2(b) but not Section 1681s-2(a); and 2) whether Section 1681t of FCRA, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Even though the regulation in question was directed at vehicle manufacturers, not biofuel manufacturers, Kavanaugh (joined by Tatel and Judge Cornelia Pillard) found standing: If the Government prohibits or impedes Company A from using Company B’s product, does Company B have standing to sue? [read post]
