Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
LightAir (EPLAW) Switzerland Madonna: no mercy from the highest court (of Switzerland) (Class 46) UAE Bahrain – new Implementing Regs enter force (Class 99) United Kingdom Collecting from charity to be balanced against collecting for charity – new deal between charities and music creators (1709 Blog) The PCC Page, no.5: taking a look at the road map (PatLit) UK: Mr Ian Hargreaves to lead independent review into how IP system can better drive growth and innovation (IP:JUR) (Class… [read post]
I
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] Lionel Michael Miller v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:44 am by kwalters
Tying together these contributions is an exploration of the deepened inequities that characterize sexual and reproductive healthcare in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
This is a resource guide for Kansas; this list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:25 am by Jackie McDermott
Miller (1939) stated that Congress has authority over the time limits and “promulgation” of an amendment. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
(Michael Geist) United States US General Motorola and Huawei lawsuit re trade secret theft (Tangible IP) US Patents Is it ‘spare time’ if your employer owns your work? [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
   Miller noticed the Telegraph had been sent a comment about the same story, and in fact the BBC and Daily Mirror also received lines and background briefings. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC finds no judicial estoppel: Prior to claim construction, and alongside an ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding, Egenera separately petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to remove one of the eleven listed inventors from the ’430 patent. [read post]