Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 2021 - 2040 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by Graham Smith
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
Several months ago, the arbitral tribunal in the matter of Philip Morris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
It’s unclear precisely what use Stross is accusing Redfin of making, but it would have been nice to get some explanation of why Redfin’s use did not violate the ACTRIS limitations anyway. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Aesthetic packages are preferred over standardized packages. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that although the precise numbers fluctuate, the percentages in the four-month sample period were generally reflective of the population of vehicles the MVD monitors for any given period.State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
 The problem is that from the judgment, it is not clear precisely what the relevant knowledge was. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
Holder), narrowed the use of race in redistricting (Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Precisely because we have all these mechanisms to share opinion, how much of that is the right amount is a contestable thing. [read post]