Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
” McNeil v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
The case is People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:22 am
In People v Steele, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence based on the police officer’s investigatory stop of defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 3:06 am
These are smart people. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am
In Edmond v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
Years ago in the case of Whren v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:52 am
By Eric Goldman Habush v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Perri v Toronto Western Hospital, 2015 ONSC 3367 [19] The plaintiff submits that the phrase “practising in the same field” means the “practice of medicine generally and knowledge of the uses of medical imaging in detecting whether there are foreign bodies in people. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Adler) In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
Anyway, this “v-card” dispute illustrates why people hate lawyers, but it’s pretty funny. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
Given her career built around essentialism, I didn’t realize Tannen was a feminist, but regarldess, I don’t agree with her. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 11:39 am
As discussed in the King case, there is no “but-it’s-a-meme” defense to copyright infringement, but some judicial deference should be given to meme usage given its importance to how people socially express themselves nowadays. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
(Orin Kerr) The March 2012 issue of the William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal has an unusual article by Thomas Krattenmaker, Looking Back on Cohen v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 10:54 am
Wendell v. [read post]
