Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
Pimstone from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:19 am
“The Court of Appeal today (1 February) dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Lord Dyson gave the leading judgment for the five-member majority, which also comprised Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Judge and Lord Kerr. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:21 am
(When the petition was denied, the case was titled Pietrangelo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:29 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
In Voisine v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
Steelers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
In Wyly v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:05 am
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
"Jeremy Phillips - shaking up the IP world with sharp analysis and casual humor since 1973Our dear blogmeister Jeremy Phillips came to podium with 41 years of experience in IP in his belt and introducing "Phillips's Three Rules of Change". 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen Cordis Corporation v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
This court’s decision in Phillips v. [read post]
