Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2021 - 2040 of 178,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 6:39 pm by Steven Gallagher and Gabrielle Gordon
Therefore, the failure to pay premiums upon separation were not “willful” and did not warrant “waiting time penalties” (i.e., Spectrum was not required to pay the employee-plaintiff 30 days’ pay for failing to pay premiums owing at the time of separation). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion, the plaintiffs argue, in to the contrary. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:05 pm by Will Newman
And so petitions for leave often make other arguments besides a need to change the result in the petitioner’s own case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Jack Garvey
Their first step was to read Judge Seeley’s district court opinion, which ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and outlined two novel areas of law in relation to climate action: climate rights and dignity law. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jun. 5, 2024) Abbott Laboratories’s Glucerna line of powders and shakes are marketed as scientifically designed for people with diabetes to help manage blood sugar. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am by Amy Howe
Solicitor General will weigh in on is whether federal law bars the plaintiffs’ state-law claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:05 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The complaint stated that plaintiffs were acting on their own behalf, and on behalf of decedent’s other four children as administrators of decedent’s estate. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Apparently, they failed to address the plaintiffs claim that the accident had “exacerbated preexisting injuries to the plaintiff's right shoulder and the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiffs’ claims under Judiciary Law § 487 are timely, Supreme Court correctly granted defendant’s motion. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
  However, the Chancery Court’s recent decision in In re Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The plaintiff, a stockholder of the Company, argued that these provisions violated Sections 141(a) and 141(c) of the DGCL. [read post]