Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 2,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
China: (IPKat),Progress in collecting karaoke royalties: (IP Dragon)EuropeSir Nicholas Pumphrey 1957-2007: (IPKat), (ipeg), (IPFactor), OHIM decision renders Crocs' foam clog Registered European Community Design invalid: (Washington State Patent Law Blog),UK dentist firm beats Lacoste in trade mark dispute: (IPKat), (IP Factor),Patent Trolls statistics, will Europe escape the trolls? [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
” asked Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, a question that best illustrates how the concept was perceived at the time. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
”[7] Indeed it is true that the extension of universal jurisdiction to piracy, according to Professor Dunoff, “had little to do with human dignity at all; rather, states sought to punish pirates as individuals because they were not (by definition) the agents of any states. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
” The Federalist No. 67, at 350 (Alexander Hamilton) (George W. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 3:09 pm
You see this in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Beyer is cited in the following case: Weed v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:57 pm
Alexander v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
” Katherine Fung, Donald Trump’s Lawyers Get Stretched Even Thinner, NEWSWEEK (Sept. 19, 2023, 11:22 AM), https://bit.ly/3S2a25B; see, e.g., Notice of Dismissal, Castro v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
See also Gaouette v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Anyone reading Federalist 1 might be forgiven for thinking that it was written by Thomas Jefferson (and not Alexander Hamilton) inasmuch as it is suffused with a faith in “the people” and their capacity for disciplined “reflection” and then wise “choice. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
