Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 2021 - 2040 of 3,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  An appeal against a decision of Langstaff J  [2018] 3 WLR 691 17 or 18 October 2018, Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:23 am by Ronald Mann
For her part, Adina Rosenbaum of Public Citizen provides a masterful defense of the Ninth Circuit’s judgment. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
In another note of distinction, Secretary Cortés-Vázquez is proud to be the first Hispanic to hold the position of Secretary of State of New York. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, gave the judgment of the court, and effectively overturned the Hildebrand principle, stating: It follows that nothing in the so-called Hildebrand rules can be relied upon in justification of, or as providing a defence to, conduct which would otherwise be criminal or actionable (whether as a tort or in equity) nor as providing any reason why the relief (whether at law or in equity) which would otherwise be available should not be granted. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
No que tange aos alunos, um indivíduo pode enfrentar a mesma situação, de várias maneiras. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
The Master of the Rolls in the sole judgment found that although this was a superficially attractive argument based on those two terms of s.89 alone, and would produce an attractive result in view of Ms H's situation, one had to consider the broader statutory context of Housing Act 1985. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
The Master of the Rolls in the sole judgment found that although this was a superficially attractive argument based on those two terms of s.89 alone, and would produce an attractive result in view of Ms H's situation, one had to consider the broader statutory context of Housing Act 1985. [read post]