Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 20,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 2:25 am
The Court had said much the same thing in Thornburg v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
We call the members of the Supreme Court “justices. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
It seems that Justice Antonin Scalia had some minimum contacts — with another vehicle, on a highway outside D.C.According to a Supreme Court spokesperson, Justice Scalia was involved in a minor car accident this morning, while heading in to One First Street to hear oral argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:56 pm
In Chrome Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
By: Farrah Rajan Justice Minister Peter Mackay claims that women are not applying to be judges because it may take them away from time with their children. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:51 pm
The justices divided on ideological lines in the ruling in Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:53 am
The court already struck down that particular provision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:54 am
In the Supreme Court, Fisher’s lawyer disclaimed any interest in having the Justices reverse their 2003 decision, Grutter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Steigman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
The government appealed, and last week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case, now called Sessions v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 11:53 am
Earlier today, Professors Pam Karlan and Jeff Fisher of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic filed this brief on behalf of the appelless in Riley v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in Filartiga v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
Justice Stevens provided the moment last week during argument in Magwood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
On Friday, Justice Clarence "I hate D.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that Canadians have no expectation of privacy in their online identity. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
” The Dissent by Justice Jim Rice – the Standing Issue In his dissent, Justice Rice focused exclusively on the issue of standing, which is indeed the fundamental issue that has prevented others from successfully pursuing climate change [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:40 pm
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
