Search for: "US v. George"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 6,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 7:17 am
” More recently, the court in its 1974 decision in Schick v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jeff Ifrah and David Yellen look at Murphy v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm
” Arkansas v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm
People have been surprised by the freedom with which they can use social media and say exactly what they think. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
In the wake of the recent BBC drama about Jeremy Thorpe, the Sun on Sunday has a piece about his barrister, George Carman QC. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In Kilbourn v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Robin Maher looks at the recent decision in McCoy v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:19 am
Only President George W. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm
The occasion was a hearing on a motion to dismiss in Cockrum v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
The article uses the recent case involving a monkey taking a selfie to hypothesise using the base principle that the US Copyright Office “will refuse to register a claim if it determines that a human being did not create the work”. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:59 am
The case was T.H. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:51 am
The court granted the motion Facts: This case (Georges v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:01 am
The workers then sought out union representation; former railroad worker Eugene V. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:26 pm
By George "Trey" Lyons, III, Nicole Grimm, and Brett Scott -- For companies in the cannabis industry seeking to protect their innovations, patent protection is typically available for cannabis-related inventions (including the plant itself), just like it is for any other invention—they just have to be new, useful, and nonobvious. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:17 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Andrew Michaels discusses SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:43 pm
Makah Indian Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
