Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 9,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
The last century’s landmark cases, which established products liability as it currently exists in the United States, involved consumer products.[1] The consumer products were sold to, or were designed to be used by, ordinary consumers, without any technical training or knowledge. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:37 pm
" Jacobson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Decisions this Week United States Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
State Farm in 1983. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:40 pm
United States, 961 F.3d 1343 (Fed. [read post]
It Could Happen Here, Too – Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in DUI Cases Outside of Illinois
29 Jul 2020, 7:47 am
Brady Violations and Illinois Law Pursuant to the ruling set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:49 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In the case of Juliana v United States, 21 Americans ranging in age from 11 to 22 filed a claim (Our Children’s Trust) initially in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015 arguing a fundamental right to live in a world with a stable climate system. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:37 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:33 pm
Inc., v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm
For example, AEDPA only permits certain habeas relief if a lower-court decision violates "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
See Smith v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
§282’s presumption of validity would be a violation of the accused infringer’s rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
