Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 6,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2007, 3:52 am
United States, 40 F.3d 1096, 1102 n. 5 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1107, 115 S.Ct. 1957, 131 L.Ed.2d 849 (1995) ("While this case does not require us to decide whether the government must affirmatively advise [an employee of his rights under Garrity ], other circuits arguably have adopted such a requirement. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:15 am
United States, you can read it here. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
Because B's home country (its "site") is the United States, A files at the defendant's (B) "site" -- the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm
The court quoted NLRB v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm
The findings state that the valid-when-made doctrine is an “important and longstanding principle [that] derives from the common law and its application has been a cornerstone of United States banking law for nearly 200 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Yet, even after feudal understandings dissipated, states still attempted to force a choice among homelands, either by finding that naturalization in a foreign state automatically resulted in the loss of citizenship, or by mandating a choice through a process known as “election. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
United States Department of StateShare this: || Join EFF [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
She took office in January of 2017, becoming the first Latina in the United States Senate. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Following Goldsmith was Thomas Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the petitioners. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
In a recent case addressing the novel issue of whether foreign law trumped United States law for purposes of class action tolling, the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Virginia, the 1967 United States Supreme Court case that struck down state bans on interracial marriage. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
The AIA did more than shift the United States to a first-inventor-to-file system, however. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
That intense experience in representing the United States in briefing and arguing cases before the Court over most of two Terms cannot be duplicated in any other capacity. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
Honeywell’s own allegations state that Arkema is marketing 1234yf to automobile manufacturers in the United States, and Arkema admits that it has already responded to at least one supply request from a U.S. automobile manufacturer and that it is “poised to respond to other requests for quotations to supply 1234yf. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
To the Chief Justice - and to the United States, which had supported the employee’s reading of Section 1981 in CBOCS, and the plaintiff’s reading of Title IX in Jackson - that made all the difference. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
