Search for: "WHITE v. STATE"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 11,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am
Bush’s failed nomination of White House counsel Harriet Miers in 2005. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the application of)… [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
Phillips v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
In Walker v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
On June 25, 2013 the Supreme Court's assessment of the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:40 am
"The case is Zervos v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 12:11 pm
A White female victim. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
President Trump has since stated that “only time will tell” who will be in the White House come January 2020. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
(To the contrary, a group of political scientists has shown that whites in jurisdictions covered by the Voting Rights Act were less likely to support Obama last November than whites elsewhere.) [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Co. v White, 548 US 53, 68). [read post]
