Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Mendez v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:41 pm
Texas courts generally agree on this point and the Austin appellate court recently affirmed that position in Bloch v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Dorman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Ware v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
Sanderson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:20 pm
App. - Austin 2008), upon which this article and excerpts were based. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 pm
State, 17 March 2010, HERE. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:25 pm
(Keeping with one of today’s themes, Umphrey mentioned cited Entergy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to reconsider her challenge to the undergraduate admissions policies used by the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
Specifically, in Politico, Kenneth Vogel examines what he describes as a “largely overlooked passage” in a 1996 article in the University of Chicago Law Review, “in which Kagan seems to diminish as anomalous the Supreme Court’s ruling in Austin v Michigan Chamber of Commerce…which allowed governments to bar corporations from paying for ads supporting or opposing candidates. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Angell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
Next week, in Schuette v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
NAACP of Austin, et al., No. 09-0420 (DB). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Austin Texas Disability law firm Bemis, Roach & Reed provides legal services to disabled individuals throughout the State of Texas. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
”); Johnston v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
The City of Austin, incidentally, after losing its case, was required to pay some $8000 in lawyers’ fees to the ACLU; no doubt the City Council viewed this as simply a cost of reassuring most Austinites that it was no friend of the Klan. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
And it cleaned up an earlier opinion without formally granting rehearing.1 New grant: How to calculate a landowner’s damages when the State takes only part of a piece of property The State of Texas v. [read post]
