Search for: "I v. B"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 24,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 1:28 pm
Here, for example, is what the defendant told the district attorney: "[B]oth of those cowards deserved what they got: death and an early expiration in life, to say the least,” and that if he “had the opportunity to do it over I would cut off their heads and send 'em both to their family! [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
(b)(7).) [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
” Jervis B. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Agency, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
[An interesting echo, I think, of NAACP v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’m pleased to say that the New Mexico Supreme Court will hear the Willock v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:11 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Scenario (b) Of course (contrary to what the AG seems to think at [39], in scenario (b) there is not even a request for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:04 am
More support for this argument from yesterday's opinion in USA v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:33 pm
The intriguing issues to be argued in Martinez are: I. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
I don’t think that if there’s a divergence b/t the results and the case law it’s fatal, because it might be that the courts were wrong, but I do think it’s important to see what kind of results you’d have gotten in such cases to see what the match is. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
A while back I was interviewed about a blog post I did on the risks of proceeding to trial versus taking the insurance company's offer. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
” Although I largely align with Holman’s views, I note that the Supreme Court did not explicitly engage with Federal Circuit precedent. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Foley, and I defended entitled Calopha, Inc. d/b/a Servpro of Mountaintop v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 12:15 pm
" True enough, I guess. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
"I smiled at how that paragraph began. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:33 pm
Young v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am
B) Austrian Economics—–I think Austrian thought will be most useful in this project in offering some broad insights for regulatory architecture. [read post]
