Search for: "M-1, LLC" Results 2041 - 2060 of 3,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2015, 4:17 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Los requisitos para solicitar una transferencia federal (“removal”) en un pleito de clase son: (1) tener 100 demandantes o más; (2) diversidad de ciudadanía estatal; y (3) los daños exceden 5 millones de dólares. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
--The international search report mailed 6 Feb. 2014 finds "X" references for claim 1 includingWO 2010/100368 and WO 2010/100369 (both to Roquette) and  EP 0 622 027 (to Kawasaki Steel).** In passing, although the arbitration decision found that Roquette was a copycat of Solazyme, both international search reports appear to suggest that claim 1 is not patentable over prior work of Roquette! [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
” Recall that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 12, 2015 - 11 AM: In re Erik M. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:24 pm
 So the property owner enters into a deal with the City in 2004 to (1) get a conditional use permit to allow the property to be used as a studio (rather than recycling center), in return for (2) payment of $2.3 million in mitigation fees for the improvement of roads, etc. around the property. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
When an LLC that owned the development borrowed money from the bank, it required the wives of the owners to sign the loan agreement, agreeing to be “primarily and unconditionally liable” for the debt, so the bank could pursue them first, before pursuing the LLC’s owners. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:06 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
María Judith (Nani) Marchand-Sánchez, Mediadora Certificada 1959, Ferraiuoli LLC   [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore reversed the dismissal of the petitioner’s claims and held that the Town Code of the Town of Clifton Park did not prohibit petitioner Boni Enterprises, LLC from constructing multiple one-family dwellings on a single lot in the B–1 district Boni Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]