Search for: "Majors v. Smith" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
A curated weekday guide to major news and developments over the past 24 hours. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Hacked Off also has an article exposing the dangerous “campaign of vitriol” aimed at GPs by certain sections of the media and some politicians in response to the Government’s decision to shift the majority of GP consultations from face-to-face to remote during the Covid-19 pandemic. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am by Jeff Welty
Framing the case as one about “government access to the existing and legitimate business records already created and maintained by a third-party telephone company,” the majority viewed the case as a straightforward application of the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
A curated weekday guide to major news and developments over the past 24 hours. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:07 pm by Howard Knopf
See here, here and here He is currently associated with Greenberg, Traurig, a powerful Washington law firm and the IP group led by Eric Smith, who is one of the key figures behind the IIPA. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER, CHARLES WESTBROOK, RICHEY OLIVER, CRAIG PORTER, SHARON WEBER, JUNE SMITH, RITA BAKER, STEPHANIE PEDDY, BILLIE RUTH HODGES, DALLAS CHRISTIAN, AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am by ilpc
Zinke) Other major ICWA stories this year that are not reflected in this post include, obviously, Texas v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am by Kate Fort
Zinke) Other major ICWA stories this year that are not reflected in this post include, obviously, Texas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 11:40 am by Lyle Denniston
” Aside from fully embracing the government’s claims about how telephone bulk data sweeps are working against terrorist threats, Judge Pauley reached a number of other major legal conclusions: ** He ruled that the constitutionality of the vast new program is controlled by a 1979 Supreme Court ruling — Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am by admin
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]