Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 70,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Today, Maker's Mark sells more than 800,000 cases of whiskey annually and most of the company’s $22 million advertising budget is used to promote it red wax seal. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 8:27 am
The Mark Thompson case -- Mark Thompson is, or was, the "incoming" CEO of the New York Times and before that was head of the BBC -- the Mark Thompson case will test the New York Times' professed commitment to principle -- its professed abhorrence of the sexual abuse of children. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
This is in line with the French case law and the CJEU ruling in Zino Davidoff, C-414/99 at 54. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:51 am
The Court, therefore, transferred the case. [read post]
23 May 2015, 3:22 pm
But it’s a travesty that this case was ever filed in the first place,” said EFF Staff Attorney Daniel Nazer, who is also the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
At the heart of the case, and of the amicus brief we helped file for INTA this week, is whether free speech concerns should trump the statutory bar on registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” marks. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 12:31 pm
In this regard the Board agreed with the examiner that the evidence was far too insufficient to establish whether this was actually the case. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
In addition to providing an extensive roadmap for how to prove a genericness claim, the case may also be of interest to food and beverage industry applicants seeking to obtain and enforce certification marks. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:13 pm
It's off topic for this blog, but I thought many of my readers would be interested in knowing that Tiffany's lost its trademark infringement case against eBay.The court held that "it is the trademark owner's burden to police its mark, and companies like eBay cannot be held liable for trademark infringement based solely on their generalized knowledge that trademark infringement might be occurring on their websites". [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
" -ed.]In any case, the Board summarized as follows:... the marks in each of the cited registrations are more than merely presentations of the letters "CL. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
"The Board found this case similar to In re Upper Deck Co., 59 USPQ2d 1688 (TTAB 2001), which involved an application to register a hologram device for trading cards, regardless of the size, shape, location, or content of the hologram. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
15-20 claimed the president was an officer or an officer of the United States (the others had nothing to do with the case). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
” The case is In Re: Erik Brunetti, No. 2015-1109 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:41 am
Although petitioner GSH established a prima facie case of abandonment based on respondent's lack of use of the mark during the three-year period following registration, respondent successfully established its bona fide intent to commence use of the mark in commerce. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 8:38 am
He is the listed inventoron US US 7461424, filed November 23, 2005, with first claimAn apparatus, comprising:a case; anda plurality of polyurethane foam pieces disposed in the case, the plurality including a first plurality of foam pieces of a first average size, a second plurality of foam pieces of a second average size, and a third plurality of foam pieces of a third average size, with the first, second, and third average sizes being different, and with the first, second, and… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:02 am
Stay strong, Mark [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:02 am
The issues on appeal generally applicable to trade-mark confusion cases are: 1. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:10 am
Summary by Mark Friedman. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 am
Sir Winston Churchill: woreCrombie but wasn't a nutter ...Crombie appealed the decision insofar as it related to the decisions on the “genuine use” and “passing-off” cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
The George Carlin case was cited:Finally, the government does not have a substantialinterest in protecting the public from scandalousness andprofanities. [read post]
