Search for: "Matter of Thomas J."
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
" J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
” Edmond Randolph’s Opinion on Recess Appointments (July 7, 1792), in 24 Papers of Thomas Jefferson 165 (Oberg & Looney eds., 2008). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Thomas. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Farrand ed. 1911) (J. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Vincent J. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
A major part of my detailed review of the Steven J. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Computing.co.uk covers the matter of internet security and how developments in policy and cybersecurity frameworks are urgently needed. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am
(J. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
Unlike the 2003 proposals that did not pay too much attention on the state law, the recently two proposals focused on the need to respect the role of state law on shareholder rights matters, the need to avoid adding to or creating new shareholder rights under state law, and the need to focus on the primary federal interest, which is full and fair disclosure.[22] The first proposal actually codifies the SEC's Staff's longstanding interpretation of Rule 14a-8(i)(8) (the… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Why isn't anyone investigating Michael J Fox? [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Frankfurter, J., concurring, in Dennis, justified this distinction. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
Boston Mayor Thomas M. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
See Brief for Respondents 24–25, 29, 32; post, at 16–17 (opinion of SOTOMAYOR, J.). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
See Transcript at 15 ("we are not arguing. . .that tort remedies. . .are pre-empted as a general matter"), 16 "if the State standard was the same as the Federal standard, there wouldn't be any conflict"), 16 ("if you failed to provide it [new information to the FDA] altogether, there would not be. . .a pre-emption defense"), 18 ("we are not arguing that there is preemption in a situation where there is new information that is not brought to FDA's… [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
J. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
But does it matter? [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
See Thomas A. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
SCALIA, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
J. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
(stating Supreme Court's Hall Street decision “is unequivocal that the grounds upon which vacatur may be based as listed in § 10 are exclusive”); In re Poly-America,L.P., 262 S.W.3d 337, 362 (Tex. 2008) (Brister, J., dissenting) (“Both federal and state law require courts to enforce an arbitrator's decision, no matter what it is, with very few exceptions. [read post]
