Search for: "Mr. X" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
It should be noted that Mr Justice Eady, sometimes said to be the “author” of the new law, was not party to any of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
In a video message posted yesterday on X, Farage said “Ten years ago I predicted there would be war in Ukraine because I thought Putin would use Nato and EU expansion. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:26 am by charonqc
” This raises two issues:  first, that Sir John Dyson, however qualified, may not have been the best choice and (b) it dilutes the intention behind the new statutory regime that it was not necessarily going to be the case that Mr Justice Buggins would get his turn and that we would seek the very best from The Bar, the profession generally, or academe. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:43 am by admin
”   Even assuming the statistics to be true – and I have no reason to doubt Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:21 am by Tim Springer
"Words can not truly express the gratitude that I feel toward Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm by Schachtman
App’x 102, 104 (3d Cir. 2011). [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:08 am
"Additionally, in preparation for her deposition, Mrs. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  I therefore consider, as did Mr Justice Teare, that that is an appropriate derogation from open justice. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The case is proceeding before Mr Justice Bernard Barton and a jury. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
It may well be that this is one of the main reasons why opposition was withdrawn by various newspaper groups shortly before Mr Price made his application before me” [24]. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:03 am by Tim Springer
"Words can not truly express the gratitude that I feel toward Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
As the authorities referred to by Mr Stark (para 26 above) show, benefit levels are not generally designed to provide a surplus above subsistence needs for the family. [read post]