Search for: "Nation v. Nation" Results 2041 - 2060 of 56,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
National Collegiate Athletic Association 16-476 Issue: Whether a federal statute that prohibits modification or repeal of state-law prohibitions on private conduct impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of states in contravention of New York v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[v] Because “new immigrants and their descendants are still projected to account for most of the nation’s population increase by mid-century,”[vi] in the absence of population growth, the U.S. economy is likely to contract in the future. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:12 am by Brennan W. Bolt
District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma issued a preliminary injunction in The Chickasaw Nation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:44 pm by Unknown
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (National Environmental Policy Act; National Historic Preservation Act) Caremark LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
AS (Somalia) and another v Entry Clearance Officer, Addis Ababa and another [2008] EWCA Civ 149; WLR (D) 67 “While section 82(1) of the Nationality, Asylum and Immigration Act 2002 permitted an appeal against any immigration decision, in the case of refusal of entry clearance, as opposed to refusal of leave to enter, the tribunal could consider only the circumstances appertaining at the time of the decision to refuse. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by sally
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]