Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Plaintiff’s testimony coherently describes his weekly work schedule, including typical daily start and end times which he used to estimate a standard work week of sixty-five to sixty-eight hours. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
More precisely, the deputy commissioner erred by failing to consider the other factors set forth in Porter, including the circumstances of the employment that “placed the workers in close proximity, that the personal relationships originated at work, and that the knife used was an implement of the employment. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm
In today’s case (Widdows v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
What did the court (actually, a magistrate) find could meet that standard? [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:51 am
Now, the latest from Nokia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:46 am
What Qualcomm wanted was to gain leverage over Apple well in advance of the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:47 pm
“By now it is no surprise that Linda Greenhouse will be leaving us for academia. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:14 am
Among other findings: 92% use unsecured personal email accounts for at least some board communications – yikes! [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:52 pm
"By now it is no surprise that Linda Greenhouse will be leaving us for academia. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:52 pm
Alaskasland.com, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
But the premise of the cases that authorize such discipline (such as Tinker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
” The precise reasoning of the opinion is a little murky. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
” Id. at *7 n.12 (citing Daubert v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Golan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
In Papish v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
As to the latter, plaintiff contends that she meets the burden articulated by the Second Circuit in Brunner v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Anti bias harassment criminal law constitutionalSTATE OF NEW JERSEY V. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:53 am
In 2013, the Supreme Court held in McQuiggin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
As between the two inquiries, risk levels provide a categorical and manageable standard that suffices to resolve the case before us. [read post]
