Search for: "People v Deal" Results 2041 - 2060 of 11,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
The lower courts are split on the issue, and perhaps the Supreme Court will soon address it in deciding the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act (which the Ninth Circuit has held unconstitutional, and which the Tenth Circuit is now considering).Here is the latest case I’ve seen that deals in some measure with this question, People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 3:52 pm
  Unless the Roberts court umpires another disputed presidential election (à la Bush v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Law tends to deal w/institutions; tends not to do much if it thinks that people are just very different from each other, if for example there are “creative people” and “others. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionJamal GreeneBruce Ackerman’s We the People series is self-consciously about canon formation. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I've been researching the cases dealing with self-defense rights of people who go to a place armed, knowing that it's likely to be dangerous; hence my posts about the Wyoming Buddha/Christ/Hercules case and about the D.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 5:53 pm by Bill Marler
One that we all have had first-hand experience from the now infamous Kreifall v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
It will take courage, diligence, a commitment to protecting people in danger as our laws allow, and respect and deference to experts in asylum who have been dealing with the consequences of Trump’s policies for four years. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISAntonio FrankoWednesday's first witness was Antonio Franko, a high school friend of Joels. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
It is at least strongly arguable that 24(3)(b) is limited in its reference to s.22(1)(2) and (4) - the sections that deal with disposal of premises to disabled people, i.e. entering an enforceable contract. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]