Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 19,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
O’Dell edited a book on Older People in Modern Ireland which contains various interesting essays), today’s decision is at odds with a trend towards a greater understanding of human rights and older people (although of course the House of Lords did not have that question before it). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:48 am
I won't attempt to defend my views on this one, and reasonable people can (and surely do) disagree. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:10 am
Sounds good to you. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:38 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
A recent example of this in IP is Lenz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The High Court ruled that the respondents’ mark was a well-known mark, inter alia, because: (a) the public and people involved in the trade had identified the respondents’ mark with the respondents’ goods distributed by them. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm
And arguably the US government routinely engages in influence operations–maybe covert, maybe not–against the American people too. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:14 pm
Padilla v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 7:22 am
Case citation: Mirza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Turns out I do a pretty good job predicting the Cal. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:12 pm
I think people like to see a good mix between just text tweets, which may be your own thoughts, and tweets with links. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
Still people don't seem to get it. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Yesterday, I attended oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of McBurney v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am
Plaut v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
Utah v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
"The very most injured people are hurt the worst by the cap, relative to those who are the very least injured people who make a full recovery," he said. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:39 pm
People v. [read post]
