Search for: "People v. Church"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 12:07 am
Some people are more particular. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
” He gives the example of finding common ground to oppose discrimination based on its harmful effects without labeling what motivates people to discriminate. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:13 am
In Gaylor v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:57 am
Grace Community Church (1988) 47 Cal.3d 278, 293.) [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm
We offered these inconsistencies to show that the Colorado law, as interpreted and enforced, is not “neutral and generally applicable” under Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The courts, of course, followed by many academics, have a quite different view (Cooper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
You could draw an analogy with the process family law went through after the war as the law was integrated with social care, economic, church/state and civil rights interests". [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
Verner and most recently in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:52 am
From Williams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
GWEN IFILL: Does Bush v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
Speaking at a press conference for the Scottish Government's Cashback for Communities Scheme, Mr MacAskill, who has himself fell foul of the law at a football match after he was held in custody on suspicion of being drunk & disorderly at an England v Scotland football match, was asked if Ms Grahame has his backing and support from the SNP. [read post]