Search for: "Root v. State" Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 4:33 pm by Sam Williams
You can read more about these later developments to the character in Siegel v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the ALJ found those statements, although ill-advised, did not carry as much weight as hearing testimony in the matter by an OFCCP Regional Director (OFCCP v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:36 am by Salvatore Gangemi of Murtha Cullina LLP
Omnicom Grp., Inc., that sexual orientation discrimination should be considered sex discrimination because “such discrimination is inherently rooted in gender stereotypes. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court also found that the employee stated plausible claims for sexual orientation discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation based on allegations of many discriminatory remarks, exclusion from meetings and projects, and termination soon after he complained (Philpott v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
Kentucky took a step closer on April 12, 2017 to making shared parenting in instances of divorce the norm in the state. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:41 am
He highlighted the four great themes of the first day’s efforts: Globalization v anti globalizationTrade v investmentGovernancePredictionHe then asked: How to move forward? [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Oncale has both reinforced the use of Price Waterhouse in sexual orientation claims and fueled separate claims for harassment rooted in homosexual desire or gender-targeted bullying.The Ruling in Hively v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:30 am by Richard Murphy
His jumping off point is the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Still Klarman’s oppositional roots betray his judgment. [read post]