Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by admin
Public sector employees are entitled to relief similar to the relief offered under the Congressional Accountability Act, Title V of the United States Code, and the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm by Holly Brezee
  Spotify also asserted that there was no reason for Ek to testify personally when there were numerous other executives at Spotify who could testify as to Spotify’s approach to licensing when expanding into the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by Justin Hendrix
For example, there are many past cases of platforms shielding conservative users from content moderation. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]