Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
The European Court of Human Rights gave an important decision today in KU v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Cord v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:00 pm
Diodoro; the Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
United States District Court, D. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Taha v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:11 am
Sila Luis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Since that effect had no technical character, it could not in itself contribute to inventive step. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
This is probably best expressed in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:01 am
Citing the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
The district court also rejected Hobbs' "unique combination" argument because it interpreted the law, as stated in Peters v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Writing on behalf of the Court, Circuit Judge Richard Posner recalled the decision in Silverman v CBS, in which the 2nd Circuit held that when a story falls into the public domain, its story elements - including its characters - also do. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
” (Nixon v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Mark McCloskey, Pardoned for Brandishing Guns at Protesters, Can't Get the Guns Back
26 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm
In Fay v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:04 am
., P.C. v DiNapoli, 2014 NY Slip Op 03191, Court of AppealsAmong the patients treated by a physician and a medical group [Providers] were individuals insured by the Empire Plan, New York State's primary health benefit plan. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
