Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 2041 - 2060
of 29,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Such quarterly disclosures state whether the issuer’s relevant officers or directors have traded in securities subject to the issuer’s buyback program within 10 business days before or after its announcement.[8] Shortcomings of the SEC’s Reforms The key shortcoming of the SEC reforms are the absence of prospective disclosure requirements with respect to the adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements and other trading arrangements despite its stated purpose of… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
Thus, courts often do decide FRAND royalty levels implicitly. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
The Court provides some additional guidance in its published opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
Stokes v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Hempstead v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTomorrow the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Counterman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
Petrella v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi challenged ITRSHRA in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
Nearly one-sixth of the country now lives in a jurisdiction where Batson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Item (f) about claim charts should be left to the way the courts apply Huawei v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
” In Dalehite et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Weber State Univ. [read post]
