Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm
Havel wrote back: plant the potatoes. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Does it matter whether the overlooked item is closely related to the other(s): for example, overlooking "v-necked t-shirts" in a list of 100 clothing items may be more readily excusable than overlooking "nuclear power plants" in an identification that lists only "chewing gum and nuclear power plants. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:06 am
National Pork Producers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:31 pm
Gulfstream Worldwide Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
State Water Resources (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 342, 359; Bridges v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
Elks v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Cooksey v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:22 am
Noelle v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Rice v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm
(ii) Development of Green Hydrogen Projects inside the Hubs in an integrated manner to allow pooling of resources and achievement of scale (iii) Enhance the cost-competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives vis-a-vis fossil-based alternatives (iv) Maximize production of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives in India within the stated financial support (v) Encourage large-scale utilization and exports of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives (vi)… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:32 am
See Forest Oil Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:01 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:33 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:27 am
The court issued a decision in the case of Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Section 111(d) says that a state is allowed to take into account, among other factors, the remaining useful life of the source, and so a state need not adopt for existing plants the same standard that applies to new plants. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm
Corder v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
