Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 5,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Jordan v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
Divorce, American style. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The rationale behind the practice directions is stated by the courts with nearly identical phrasing. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm
The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
The ‘964 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Knowles v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
The ‘964 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Knowles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for compiling all these cases, and special thanks to Aurora Temple Barnes for making 20 new case pages (and rephrasing the questions presented to SCOTUSblog style) on such short notice. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Summer 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:22 am
Billimoria v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:43 pm
In this context, it is interesting to note a decision of the United Kingdom Queen's Bench in Macquarie Internationale Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
The ‘287 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled SMT Solutions v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
The ‘287 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled SMT Solutions v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:19 pm
And also this week, David Boies and Ted Olson did a phenomenal job of in the Ninth Circuit panel’s hearing on the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:26 pm
Alan Mygatt-Tauber, Medellin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Elonis v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 3:32 am
; United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" Stone Lion Capital Partners v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
Gideon v. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
” from a post by Kelly Laycock.The logic and style of the arguments about patent examiners is indeed incomprehensible.Perhaps "patenthawk" should include law review articles, in addition to court decisions, within his scope; from a recent post on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
