Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
This determination made her subject to a 15% health insurance premium contribution requirement set out in the controlling Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Case Name: KELVIN BOURKE v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
The case is John Doe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:00 pm
Imperial Aluminum-Scottsboro, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yorktown Congress of Teachers, 98 AD3d 665. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
This determination made her subject to a 15% health insurance premium contribution requirement set out in the controlling Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:56 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:39 am
Bond v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:10 am
----Last week, the European Patent Litigators Association, EPLIT, ran a mock trial in Munich based on the famous Improver v Remington litigation. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 N.Y.2d 526, Civil Service Law §61(1) grants the appointing authority broad discretion in the selection of candidates, including that of appointing a lower-scoring candidate over a higher-scoring one. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
Over at JOTWELL, Pat Gutridge (University of Miami School of Law) has shined a spotlight on a student Note by Daniel Taylor Young, titled, "How Do You Measure a Constitutional Moment? [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Vishnu Kannan shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:13 am
Nathaniel Sobel analyzed the recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case Commonwealth v. [read post]
