Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,797
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
S. 500, 515 (1964), in turn quoting Scales v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
People with capacity are entitled to make decisions for themselves, including about what they will and will not eat, even if their decision brings about their death. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
In the last thirty years, legal formants and legal narratives produced in core countries according to capitalistic economic needs have been detached from their own background and moved upward to a global scale, so to constitute a new global economic order, a law-non-law with no clear source nor geographical location, which is however territorialized any time it is respected and or coercively enforced. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:37 am
“There were already changes made as of Sept. 1, 2010, and now we’re looking at what appears to be another potential clawback on what injured people are going to be able to access. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Our Fort Lauderdale defense attorneys know this was the core issue in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  People don’t understand counterintuitive rules, and the rules without an exemption are counterintuitive. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:01 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Last night the We the People petition to encourage public access to the results of taxpayer-funded research reached and exceeded its goal of 25,000 signatures, so we should expect a response from the White House. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:29 pm
 Thus we might say that Bill is a 0.6 member in the set of tall people (on a scale from 0--not at all a member--to 1--completely a member). [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
The First Circuit’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
” Some media tycoon could sweeped in to the US in the late 1960s, lobbied the right people, assembled enough capital, and built an alternative network. [read post]