Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 11,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Rees, 551 U.S. ---- (U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
Aug 2: In the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
However, this attempt to distinguish Flores-Montano is off the mark. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Maybe an apostrophe will just do the job instead...The Review Board then considered Section 906 (1) of the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices which sets out that: the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
Nu Science Corporation v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
Cuero “marks at least the fourth such reversal of a … ruling” by Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
On remand from the U.S District Court for the District of Columbia, the Board sustained this opposition to registration of the mark GUANTANAMERA for cigars, finding the mark to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive under Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Two months ago, in June 2011, I found a U.S. software company tried to register a trademark for that exact name for some computer software. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Two months ago, in June 2011, I found a U.S. software company tried to register a trademark for that exact name for some computer software. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
By Dennis Crouch MadStad Enginering v. [read post]
Applying Preclusion Based on TTAB Decision, Ohio District Court Denies Non-Infringement Counterclaim
5 Jul 2017, 3:19 am
Buzz Seating Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:34 am
” Park ’N Fly, 469 U.S. at 194. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 5:59 am
" Tyco Fire Products LP v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 2:46 am
CSC Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
This marks the first time a president has approved a military death sentence in 51 years. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
