Search for: "United States v. Brown"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am
Craig Forcese discussed Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou’s legal battle in Canada over extradition to the United States, and Quinta Jurecic shared Huawei’s lawsuit against the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:12 am
Hejran is staff counsel at Americans United for Life, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 207 members of Congress in support of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 10:44 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Id. at 312, 622 S.E.2d at 215 (quoting Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:29 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Court's Admission of Co-Defendant's Plea Allocution Was Error Violating Confrontation Clause Right
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:03 am
” Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation and expanded in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:36 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Ferguson's separate but equal doctrine which allowed for segregation in schools and other public facilities to Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm
Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Here, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery County Hosp Dist v Brown makes clear that while an oral agreement can modify an employee’s at-will employment status, to do so, the employer must unequivocally indicate its “definite intent to be bound not to terminate the employee except under clearly specified circumstances. [read post]
