Search for: "AT&T IncĀ " Results 2061 - 2080 of 50,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it had filed litigation against Liberty Energy, Inc., d/b/a Liberty Oilfield Services, LLC, for subjecting three workers to “discrimination and harassment. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by Jonathan Deschamps
De l’avis du Tribunal, l’article 111.0.17 du Code doit être interprété de manière restrictive. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 19cv1715-JO-AHG, 2023 WL 4417265, -- F.R.D. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Maursky v Latham 2023 NY Slip Op 04115 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department seems to be a fair decision, yet doesn’t really say why the court reversed the grant of dismissal. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:14 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
7106284 FLAMEWORKS APOTHECARY 7106245 TIME-KEEPER 7106059 RA 7105991 RECON SPORTS 7105632 M MADSEN STEEL WIRE PRODUCTS 7105226 LIPPERT INSIGHT 7105099 DIVERSION 7104333 NATRAPEST 7104327 DIAMOND SHINE 7109496 VELLUM 7103945 WHITETAIL VALLEY 7109422 THE BOOK OF SUTEKH 7103798 VONZETTA’S LAVISH HAIR BOUTIQUE 7103712 CLASSIC REDEFINED, SIZES 12W-44W 7103662 DEATHSTALKER DEMIGODS 7103642 DEAD OCEANS 7109277 FIRST ONE DOESN’T COUNT 7103176 AIRSTREAM 7103161 SMOOCHEZ 7109048 GALLERY… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
” The district court held that the Ninth Circuit’s 2007 opinion in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
The applicant stated that “[t]he English translation of ‘CREMA BELLA’ in the mark is ‘BEAUTIFUL CREAM. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:38 am by Jon Hyman
  Further, we don't even know yet what the application of this newly announced standard looks like, as the NLRB did not pass judgment on Stericycle's policies, but instead remanded the case to an ALJ to apply the new standard. [read post]
In the case at issue, the appellant, Shopify Inc., appealed the decision of the GC T‑222/21, SHOPPI (already commented here), alleging infringement of Article 53(1) of EUTM Regulation no. 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b). [read post]