Search for: "Does 1 - 30"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 28,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 6:08 pm
This Friday’s Five highlights five key bills that California employers need to monitor: 1. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:54 pm
The Indiana FSSA posted a "Notice of Intent' to adopt a rule on 4/30/08. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 7:14 pm
In CA, it is the law that your employer allows you to take a 30 minute meal break for every 5 hours you have worked, if your work day is longer than 6 hours. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:38 am
Although this is encouraging, alcohol is still involved in 30 percent of Michigan traffic fatalities. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:04 pm
Table 1: An Illustrative Risk-Informed Choice Set Option Prob Hazard Benefits Costs Net Benefits A 0.1 -$100 $10 $55 -45 B 0.3 -$80 $24 $40 -16 C 0.5 -$60 $30 $25 5 D 0.7 -$40 $28 $10 18 To see how this is so, consider a highly simplified and hypothetical choice scenario reflected in the table above. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:18 pm
Question #1 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Work Visa I had h1b approved on 8/31/2011. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 am
After that, the Governor has until September 30 to sign or veto the legislation. [read post]
29 Jul 2006, 8:14 am
Actually face to face attorney time in a high volume firm may amount to 30 minutes or less. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:25 am
The ban on contributions during session does not apply to special sessions in Indiana. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:00 pm
— My Panama Lawyer (@mypanamalawyer) November 1, 2014The OECD actions take place 1 week before the November 111th celebrations of Panama's secession from Colombia, when nationalism is at its highest point.- See more at: http://www.mire.gob.pa/noticias/2014/10/30/panama-reevalua-su-estrategia-de-estado-en-materia-de-intercambio-de-informacionShare | [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:07 pm
Claims 2–13, 19– 23, and 29–30 fell with claim 1. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If you are one of those middle class folks who voted for him, you may not realize what you voted for until he does it. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:45 am
We do not have firm statistics in this area, but from a general overview of litigation it seems to us that a higher percentage of legal malpractice cases are subject to motions to dismiss under CPLR 3211(a)(1) than are other types of cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:47 pm
Additionally, no legal penalties are specified; the only remedy is forbreach of agreement.The Law Against Unfair Competition, September 2, 1993, http://www.law-bridge.net/english/LAW/20065/1322511795243.html and Regional regulations: Labour Contract Regulations of Shanghai Municipality, effective May 1, 2002, http://www.12333.gov.cn/english/rules/rule/t20041028_4648.html http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/node8059/FAQ/node8462/node8464/index.html. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:16 am
There are some tricky parts 1. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
However, a taxpayer in this situation is, generally, permitted an "equivalent" CDP hearing; however, an equivalent CDP hearing does not carry with it the right to appeal to the United States Tax Court. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:44 am
On June 1, 2016, an amendment to the Mexican IP law was published in the Federal Official Gazette, which will implement this long-awaited opposition system, as of August 30, 2016. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:43 pm
In its visit of Monaco in March 2006, the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) met suspect unlawfully detained (CPT/Inf (2007)20 §30). [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
Here, the Health District's actions on January 30, 2004, and December 15, 2005, did not pass beyond the level of observation the Court found acceptable in Dunn. [read post]
