Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 2061 - 2080 of 12,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
As to auxiliary requests 5 to 10 and 13 to 23, the board noted that claim 1 of each request, although amended, did not comply with Article 123(2) EPC for essentially the same reasons as claim 1 of the main request.XI. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am by Unknown
(You can read more about it in these blog posts: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.) [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 8:03 am by David Adelstein
Does a constructive acceleration claim require the contractor to always request an extension of time which is then denied by the owner? [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am by Stephen Wermiel
Here’s a quick quiz: When does 6 plus 1 not necessarily add up to 7? [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am by Jessica Smith
For example, the doctrine applied when (1) the defendant possessed a unique tool not generally traded in his community 27 days after it was stolen and fingerprint evidence tied the defendant to the theft, State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Question #1 – H-1B Non-Immigrant Visa Who is included in the H-1B CAP? [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (In other words, mere affiliation confusion does not plausibly harm goodwill or reputation! [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:55 pm by Marcel Pemsel
(‘M&T’), applied for registration of the Community design no. 002138008-0031 for ‘door and window handles’: The design was registered on 27 November 2017. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The three-step test would be also part of such a mandate: the circumstance that a parody is made for profit does not rule out the very applicability of Article 70(1) of the Italian Act: what matters is not that circumstance, but rather whether the alleged parody unduly conflicts with the normal exploitation of the earlier work.If the approach indicated by the Italian Supreme Court was to be seen from an international law perspective, then an argument could plausibly be made that… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
J 27/90, OJ EPO 1993, 422, 426), but at the latest within one year following the expiry of the unobserved time limit.2.2 On 5 November 2012 the Office sent a communication (EPO Form 2522) to the appellant's European representative informing him of the non-payment of the renewal fee for the fourth year under Rule 51(1) EPC and the possibility to validly pay the renewal fee together with the additional fee within the six-month period following the due date. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Specifically, because New York’s residential housing is a heavily-regulated industry (as evidenced by, among other things, rent control/stabilization, the statutory warranty of habitability, and the tenant protections afforded by the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019), any actor entering that market does so with the expectation that further restrictions may be imposed. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:34 am
See Section 18(c) of Malawi’s Patent Act and Section 13(1)(c) of Zimbabwe’s Patent Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Specifically, because New York’s residential housing is a heavily-regulated industry (as evidenced by, among other things, rent control/stabilization, the statutory warranty of habitability, and the tenant protections afforded by the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019), any actor entering that market does so with the expectation that further restrictions may be imposed. [read post]