Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm
(¶1.) [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
(¶1.) [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In decision T 254/93 it was decided that the mere explanation of an effect obtained when using a compound in a known composition, even if the effect was not known to be due to this compound in the known composition, cannot confer novelty to a known process if the skilled person was already aware of the occurrence of the desired effect (see headnote 2 and point [4.8] of the reasons).[36] Thus the subject-matter of claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 54; the… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
” In re Soni, 54 F.3d 746, 750 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In this opposition appeal case Board 3.3.02 had to decide on the novelty of claim 1 as granted, which read:1. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
One has had an abortion. 1 used steroids in the past year. 1 or two are in foster care. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
One has had an abortion. 1 used steroids in the past year. 1 or two are in foster care. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
Contract Transp., Inc., 452 F.3d 543, 553–54 (6th Cir.2006). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 am
It does so on a quid pro quo principle. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
The appellant lost in Ex parte WeinerKSR is mentioned:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
It does not mention “loss of control” and “free disposal”.It does however make clear, to those familiar with board of appeal practice, that the criterion cited in the decision (point [3.3], second paragraph) as established case law, namely that even the theoretical possibility of access is novelty-destroying for an invention, sets higher confidentiality requirements than criteria such as “loss of control” and “free disposal”. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Dodeck reports that in the past few decades the number of government lawyers and their proportion in the Canadian legal profession has continued to rise.[1] The reason it is important to ensure a more efficient discretionary and prosecutorial policy making system in Canada is that statistics indicate many individuals are wrongly convicted or found not guilty every year. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Dodeck reports that in the past few decades the number of government lawyers and their proportion in the Canadian legal profession has continued to rise.[1] The reason it is important to ensure a more efficient discretionary and prosecutorial policy making system in Canada is that statistics indicate many individuals are wrongly convicted or found not guilty every year. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:06 am
NIOSH's goals are: 1. [read post]
Ford Motor Company v. Washington (Ford III): The Third Time Is Not the Charm (and it ain’t over yet)
5 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
Id. at 1-2. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
From a more general perspective, the Court noted that the admissibility or validity of an application for a declaration of invalidity does not depend on the good faith of the applicant. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
See Bouie, 378 U.S. at 353-54, 84 S.Ct. 1697. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:41 am
Below are ten suggested practical steps. 1. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:41 am
Below are ten suggested practical steps. 1. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:43 am
Unfortunately for fund managers, DFI does not believe the SEC and NASAA Model Rules are enough regulation. [read post]
