Search for: "In Re Adoption of J"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 2,675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
At a trial by judge alone (Tugendhat J), the defendant failed to prove that the claimant had abused her position by acting on a conflict of interest [7], [141-147]. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Of particular interest in an article by Gustavo J. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
There is no statute allowing the City to prosecute all misdemeanors regardless of whether or not these offenses have been adopted by the city code. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
At First instance ([2010] EWHC 660 (Pat)), Floyd J found the patent valid but not infringed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Tugendhat J held that the claimant was not seeking to re-litigate an issue that had been determined by a competent court and that the claim was not a Jameel abuse. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
-Adrian J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:43 pm
Steven J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:57 pm
Early in the day, commissioners were on track to adopt the mandates. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
He will divide time with Eric J. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
But clause 1 re-enacted and clarified the common law in important respects, and that strategy might with profit have been adopted here too. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
J. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
J. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:21 pm
No statistical model could have predicted them," notes Steven J. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am
Obama has adopted Protocol 1 to appease the domestic left and especially the “international community” that will be dismayed by his new embrace of Gitmo and George W. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
Shifting the Paradigm of the Debate: A Proposal to Eliminate At-Will Employment and Implement a 'Mandatory Arbitration Act' Zev J. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
William J. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
” In re Ephedra Prods. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
Fact that info will be “out there” should not alter the principle that court info generally should be public @hmintz #barmedia Awesome that this panel has adopted the phrase “nutty blogger”, and that everyone understands who they’re talking about. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:08 am
You're right Skippy, maybe the movie industry will finally give up this time. [read post]
